Around 1490, Leonardo da Vinci created a drawing that would become one of the most recognizable images in human culture.

A male figure appears in two overlapping positions. His arms and legs extend into a circle and a square, while Leonardo’s handwritten notes surround the body like the margins of an unfinished investigation.

Today, the drawing is known as the Vitruvian Man.

It has become an emblem of the Renaissance, anatomy, architecture, geometry, and the search for harmony between the individual and the larger order of the world.

Yet beneath its familiar image lies a question that remains alive today:

How does a human being relate to the system of which he or she is a part?

For Vitruvius, that system was architecture.

For Leonardo, it became the relationship between the human body, geometry, movement, and nature.

For MuHuGo, the Museum of Human Goals, that system is human intention.

 

Vitruvius and the Relationship Between the Parts and the Whole

The word “Vitruvian” comes from Marcus Vitruvius Pollio, the Roman architect, engineer, and author of De architectura, commonly known as The Ten Books on Architecture.

Vitruvius understood architecture as far more than the construction of buildings. His writings addressed geometry, materials, water systems, mechanics, acoustics, climate, cities, and the education of the architect.

At the center of his thinking was the principle of proportion.

Each part of a structure should relate to the other parts and to the whole. A column, a foundation, an interior space, and a façade should not appear as unrelated elements. Together, they should form an intelligible system.

To explain this principle, Vitruvius turned to the human body.

The importance of his comparison was not that every human body follows one perfect numerical standard. The deeper idea was relational:

A part may retain its own identity while gaining fuller meaning through its relationship to the whole.

 

Leonardo: Theory Tested Through Observation

Leonardo was not the first artist to interpret Vitruvius’s description of the human body within a circle and a square. His solution, however, became the most enduring.

He did not force the living body into a single rigid diagram. Instead, he used two positions of the figure and allowed the relationship between body and geometry to remain dynamic.

The drawing therefore became more than an illustration of an ancient text.

It became a visual experiment.

Leonardo brought together observation, anatomy, geometry, movement, writing, and artistic judgment. The result reflects one of the defining qualities of Renaissance thought: inherited knowledge is respected, but it is also examined, tested, and reimagined.

The Vitruvian Man should not be understood simply as an image of the “ideal body.” Its deeper importance lies in the way it presents the human being as an investigator of relationships between nature, knowledge, space, and form.

 

From the Architecture of the Body to the Architecture of Intention

Today, the human body can be measured with a precision unavailable to either Vitruvius or Leonardo.

Yet some of the most decisive forces in human life cannot be measured with a ruler:

• purpose;

• hope;

• responsibility;

• commitment;

• imagination;

• aspiration;

• the desire to serve;

• the intention to leave a meaningful legacy.

It is within this field that MuHuGo introduces the contemporary concept of Architecture of Intent™.

Architecture of Intent™ is not a theory of Vitruvius, nor should it be attributed to Leonardo da Vinci. It is a modern cultural and museum-based dialogue with the question they helped make visible.

Vitruvius asked how the parts of a building form a coherent whole.

Leonardo explored how the body exists within geometric order.

MuHuGo asks a new question:

How do human goals, values, decisions, and relationships participate in the construction of the future?

 

Intention Before Form

Every visible structure begins before its foundation is laid.

It begins with an intention:

• to build a home;

• to establish a school;

• to create a museum;

• to open a laboratory;

• to restore a community;

• to protect a cultural memory;

• to bring people together.

Intention is invisible, yet it initiates a visible chain of human action.

MuHuGo does not suggest that intention alone guarantees success. Between aspiration and achievement stand many realities: education, health, law, resources, access, inequality, cooperation, circumstance, and responsibility.

For that reason, Architecture of Intent™ is not a doctrine of wishful thinking.

It is a framework for considering the relationship between an inner direction and the world in which that direction must take form.

 

The Goal Card Method™

At the center of MuHuGo’s cultural practice is the Goal Card Method™, through which a personal intention receives documentary form and may become part of a living cultural archive.

A Goal Card does not merely record a completed achievement.

It preserves an earlier and more fragile moment: the moment when a person names a direction for the future.

Traditional archives often preserve completed events, official decisions, recognized achievements, and established reputations. They rarely preserve the moment when an idea first appeared, before anyone knew whether it would succeed.

MuHuGo turns toward that beginning.

The proprietary methodology, archival procedures, internal structure, data systems, and implementation protocols of the Goal Card Method™ are not disclosed in this publication.

 

A Living Museum and a Living Archive

Traditional museums preserve what has already entered history:

• artworks;

• documents;

• objects;

• archaeological material;

• records of public events;

• evidence of cultural life.

MuHuGo expands the museum’s relationship with time.

It preserves not only memory from the past, but also human intentions expressed in the present and directed toward the future.

This creates a broader museum model:

The museum as a place.
The museum as a person.
The museum as intention.

This model does not replace traditional collections. It adds a new layer of cultural evidence: a record of what people hoped to create, protect, change, understand, or become.

 

Florence Biennale and a Continuing Dialogue

In 2019, the XII Florence Biennale was organized under the theme Ars et Ingenium: Toward Leonardo da Vinci’s Legacy of Similitude and Invention.

The exhibition considered Leonardo as an artist and investigator whose work moved across anatomy, nature, engineering, perception, and visual culture.

At that Biennale, Andrii Chernovil received recognition in the category of Drawing, Calligraphy and Printmaking.

It would be historically inaccurate to claim that the Florence Biennale endorsed Architecture of Intent™ or identified MuHuGo as a continuation of Leonardo’s work. The contemporary concept developed independently and took its present form later.

The context nevertheless remains meaningful.

An early stage of Andrii Chernovil’s artistic inquiry was presented within an international event dedicated to Leonardo’s interdisciplinary legacy.

MuHuGo now views this moment as one point within a longer cultural dialogue about the human being, art, knowledge, and the future.

 

The Human Being as a Measure of Direction

The Vitruvian Man placed the human figure at the center of a system of spatial relationships.

MuHuGo shifts the emphasis from physical proportion to the direction of human activity.

Two people of the same height may shape entirely different futures.

Two institutions with similar resources may leave profoundly different cultural legacies.

Two cities of comparable size may pursue opposite social priorities.

Physical scale does not determine direction.

Direction emerges through intention, judgment, responsibility, and action.

This leads to one of the central propositions of Architecture of Intent™:

The human body may serve as a measure of space.
Human intention may serve as a measure of the direction of the future.

 

An Unfinished Conversation

Vitruvius examined the architecture of buildings.

Leonardo examined the architecture of the human body.

MuHuGo documents the architecture of human intention.

This is not an attempt to replace the Vitruvian Man or claim direct historical inheritance from Leonardo.

It is an effort to continue the question through the language of a contemporary museum.

If the body shows how a human being occupies space, intention reveals where that human being seeks to go.

If proportion connects the parts of a structure, shared purpose may connect people.

Five centuries ago, Leonardo placed the human figure between the circle and the square.

Today, the question is no longer only how a person fits within the world.

The question is what happens when human intention becomes visible, enters cultural memory, and begins to participate in shaping the world that comes next.

 

Rights Notice

Architecture of Intent™ and Goal Card Method™ are proprietary concepts developed within the MuHuGo ecosystem.

© 2026 Andrii Chernovil and Nadiia Chernovil.
Published by MuHuGo with authorization from the rights holders.
All rights reserved.

This publication presents only the general cultural and philosophical framework of MuHuGo. It does not disclose proprietary methodologies, operational procedures, archival protocols, participant-processing systems, data structures, research instruments, licensing models, or implementation methods.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, adapted, distributed, translated, or used to develop a substantially similar educational, museum, archival, commercial, or technological system without prior written permission from the rights holders.

​